I agree; "IQ tests" do not measure "intelligence" (which itself is rather difficult to define) but rather a combination of mathematics and vocabulary skills. It does not measure any inherent quality, but changes dramatically over time. To prove the point, I looked up the
SAT conversion chart. I took the SAT in 7th grade, as part of the Duke TIP; my combined verbal and quantitative score was around a 1050. That's a 115 according to the chart. I took the PSAT Sophomore year, and got a 210 (which correlates to a 2100). So, assuming my verbal + quantitative was a 1400, my IQ apparently jumped to a 143. When I get the results back for my actual High School SAT, my "IQ" will probably have jumped another couple points!
Obviously, IQ tests are BS. But they can be fun to chat about if no one takes it seriously. I've always wondered if a more objective IQ test is possible; can enough testing create a sound system or is the entire idea silly?