Why not Fusion? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 11:16:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Why not Fusion? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you support 'fusion'?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
#3
it is not an important issue
 
#4
undecided
 
#5
all other answers
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Why not Fusion?  (Read 3662 times)
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

« on: May 15, 2007, 12:14:13 PM »

Yes, we have it in New York and I like the way it works.  It's not a huge issue though.
Logged
KEmperor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,454
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -0.05

« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2007, 12:31:37 AM »

Don't understand it from the article given to me.

Basically, you have third parties on the ballot that often endorse people running for the main parties too.  For example, for President Bush, he was a candidate for both the NY Republican Party and the NY Conservative Party.  If for some reason, he did something to piss off the Conservative Party, they could endorse someone else, which could end up costing him votes in the state. 

It might seem silly, but there are a lot of voters who are members of one of our 3rd parties that take it very seriously and vote straight party line.  It gives those 3rd parties a lot of pull in close races, where if the Republican candidate doesn't get the endorsement of the Conservatives or maybe the Independence Party, it could cost him the election.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 15 queries.