Intelligence Czar (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 12:12:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Intelligence Czar (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Intelligence Czar  (Read 2126 times)
raggage
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 505


« on: July 25, 2004, 01:34:18 AM »

If the so called Intelligence Czar position is created, and is a cabinet level position under a Kerry administration, who do you think would likely hold the post?

I've heard a few names bandied about, including J. Robert Mueller, and my big boss William Bratton?

Any ideas?
Logged
raggage
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 505


« Reply #1 on: July 25, 2004, 11:42:18 PM »

How about Michael Moore?  That ought to make you guys happy?

I'm sure he'd do better than Bush's administration has!
Logged
raggage
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 505


« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2004, 02:02:54 AM »

Ok, well maybe not Michael Moore, but partisan feeling aside, it was George W Bush's fault, or more correctly that of his administration which allowed the United States to get to the precarious position it is in, and has been in since 2001.

 Bush allowed a tragedy to happen on his watch, through bad organisation, plain and simple.

As for my earlier comment, take it more of as an Anybody but Bush statement. It matters not whether one is republican or democrat, the point is Bush screwed up. Hell, I'd trust Rick Santorum to keep America 'safe' more than I would G.W.... (don't tell Keystone Phil I said that)

What I don't understand is why the Republicans on this board level absolutely no blame on the president is beyond me.

If this had happened on Clintons watch, who mind you wasn't much better prepared, I'd be just as angry.
Logged
raggage
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 505


« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2004, 03:58:41 AM »

Ok, well maybe not Michael Moore, but partisan feeling aside, it was George W Bush's fault, or more correctly that of his administration which allowed the United States to get to the precarious position it is in, and has been in since 2001.

 Bush allowed a tragedy to happen on his watch, through bad organisation, plain and simple.

As for my earlier comment, take it more of as an Anybody but Bush statement. It matters not whether one is republican or democrat, the point is Bush screwed up. Hell, I'd trust Rick Santorum to keep America 'safe' more than I would G.W.... (don't tell Keystone Phil I said that)

What I don't understand is why the Republicans on this board level absolutely no blame on the president is beyond me.

If this had happened on Clintons watch, who mind you wasn't much better prepared, I'd be just as angry.


OK Nothing happened under Clintons watch right? The World Trade Towers, Oklahoma, Kobar embassy buildings, Mogadishu, Rawanda, Bosnia, USS Cole. Need I really continue on? So far under Bush, 9/11. Who's done a more successful job in you opinion?

No, intelligence failures did happen on Clinton's watch. But you can't seriously compare those events to the catastrophic scale of 9/11... and if you do you are deluded.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.