Well, since you've declined to respond to a few ... .
What posts were those? It was not intentional. I will respond to any post you link me to.
I would appreciate the same in return. Here is the post in question.
If you say it's "fairly clear that it [wasn't] methodology," you're saying it's fairly clear that it was a one-in-many-million event. It must be one, the other, or an accurate observation. I am still waiting for you to pick one of the three. They are the only three options.
"one=in=many-million"?!?
Go back and reread basic survey research methodology.
One out of twenty times the MoE is likely to be exceeded for a sample.
As to subsamples, the MoE is generally so large, its not worth examing.
