the biggest 'surprise' state (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 04:52:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  the biggest 'surprise' state (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: the biggest 'surprise' state  (Read 7836 times)
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

« on: April 18, 2004, 11:42:29 AM »

Actually the biggest suprise may be California!

First, prior to 1992 California voted Republican in Presidential elections from 1952 - 1988 (1964 exception).

Second, the Republican candidates for Govenor in the recall election received far more votes than the Democrat candidates.

Third, the party registration in California is significantly better for the Republicans in that state than was the case in 2000.

Fourth, the liberal media really went nuts during the recall election calling the voters nuts for wanting to recall Davis.  This badly undermined their credibility with the voters there.  As the liberal media is a major prop of the Kerry campaign, this is bad news for Kerry.

Fifth, it seems likely that the California economy will improve in the next six months even faster than the national average.

Sixth, while the California electorate tends to be socially more liberal than the nation, it has a long record of dislike for tax increases.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2004, 01:04:29 PM »

Gustaf,

First, the polls (Field, LA Times, etc.) have consistently shown a liberal/Democrat bias.  The bias tends to reduce as elections approach.

Second, I think you meant to say that California's economy suffered more than the national econoy.  This is in part from the major components of that economy which are poised for a major recovery.

Third, in addition to the California Presidential election history which I cited, I noted the recent trends in voter registration and the recall election.

Fourth, while Texas did vote for Democrat candidates for President in the first half of the twentieth century, those familiar with the voting practices of texas would not suggest if voted democratically (south Texas was notorious for vote fraud).
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2004, 07:20:44 PM »

Gustafson,

Perhaps I was unclear vis a vis Texas political practices prior to 1961.  

To be specific, Texas generally cast its electoral college vote for the Democrat party nominee for Preisdent, but often that had nothing to due with the democratic process.  The distinction is that the capital 'D' refers to the party while the lower case 'd" refers to the process.  There is considerable evidence to indicate that some Democrats achieved public office by vote fraud rather than honest votes of the electorate (the democratic process).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.