CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 10,638
![](./avatars/Republican/R_AZ.gif)
Political Matrix E: 1.38, S: -0.51
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: October 31, 2004, 09:12:12 AM » |
|
I must disagree with some of your "assumptions," with explanations.
First, ballot measures on several states are impacting the vote there:
Maine In addition to the 'hunters rights' ballot measure there is 'Prop 13" style property tax limitation on the ballot. Kerry is NOT assured of winning the state!
Michigan The 'marriage' measure on the ballot combined with a late (but effective) bush campaign there pointing out Kerry's support for Kyoto and increased CAFE standards has also made this a swing state.
Oregon Oregon has two measures on the ballot which help Bush. First is the 'marriage' measure and second is the medical malpractice tort reform measure. This is also a swing state.
Second, I disagree with your assignment of probabilities on the states you listed as 'swing' states. You are far to generous in several of them to Kerry. I'll only list those that are significantly off the mark.
Specifically,
Maine CD2 45% rather than 90% would be more accurate. New Hampshire 45% would be more accurate than 80%. Ohio 45% would be more accurate than 55%. Pennsylvania 52% would be more accurate than 85%
|