Atlasia Clean Energy Act of 2010 (on the President's Desk)

[hawkeye59]

I'm not a senator, but I would like an amendment cutting the burning of fossil fuels by 20%.

[hawkeye59]

I'm not a senator, but I would like an amendment cutting the burning of fossil fuels by 20%.

Completely unrealistic and impossible any time in the next 20 to 25 years.

10%?

[hawkeye59]

I'm not a senator, but I would like an amendment cutting the burning of fossil fuels by 20%.

Completely unrealistic and impossible any time in the next 20 to 25 years.

10%?

Maybe in a time window of 15 to 20 years.

We aren't going to get off fossil fuels by any substantial amount till they build a working Fusion Reactor and efficient Hydrogen Fuel Cells with hydrogen produced from Water Electrolysis using Electricity derived from the Nuclear Fusion. Thats 50 to 75 years from now.

The best alternative that would currently work is Coal liquification which gets git by these Carbon limitation efforts. It is profitable any time oil is above $45 a barrell compared to Ethenol which Atlasia quit subsizing a while ago and is  not only is not profitable compared to oil, it actually uses oil to make it, more oil then is used to make 1 gallon of gas to make 1 gallon of ethenol.

How about cutting the emissions of fossil fuels by 20%?

[hawkeye59]

I'm not a senator, but I would like an amendment cutting the burning of fossil fuels by 20%.

Completely unrealistic and impossible any time in the next 20 to 25 years.

10%?

Maybe in a time window of 15 to 20 years.

We aren't going to get off fossil fuels by any substantial amount till they build a working Fusion Reactor and efficient Hydrogen Fuel Cells with hydrogen produced from Water Electrolysis using Electricity derived from the Nuclear Fusion. Thats 50 to 75 years from now.

The best alternative that would currently work is Coal liquification which gets git by these Carbon limitation efforts. It is profitable any time oil is above $45 a barrell compared to Ethenol which Atlasia quit subsizing a while ago and is  not only is not profitable compared to oil, it actually uses oil to make it, more oil then is used to make 1 gallon of gas to make 1 gallon of ethenol.

How about cutting the emissions of fossil fuels by 20%?

That is possible but it will take longer then most expect and cost a lot, but its feasible.

Didn't you already ask that question?

No, he didn't. He asked about consumption first then emmissions.

lol, usually I am the one who misses the subtle details like that.

Like 20 to 30 years?