Election 2012: Barack Obama 42%, Ron Paul 41% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:51:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Election 2012: Barack Obama 42%, Ron Paul 41% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Election 2012: Barack Obama 42%, Ron Paul 41%  (Read 9784 times)
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


« on: April 14, 2010, 05:22:41 PM »

lol how did we get two Sewer Socialists(') from California on a single board?  I think you guys should duel for the name.  
Logged
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2010, 07:44:09 PM »


Yeah, I don't buy this.

However, I think Paul would do better then with Republicans than he would now, because by 2012, the Iraq War will be much less relevant.
The Republican Party will weed him out based on his non-interventionist foreign policy.  It sounds great in theory, but its very scary.  Most Americans will not vote for a person who looks softer on terrorism than Obama.
Logged
TheGreatOne
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 477


« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2010, 07:44:42 PM »

FiveThirtyEight.com posits that, without Rasmussen's house effect, Obama vs. Paul is more like Obama +10, which is probably closer to the truth.

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/romney-not-paul-fares-best-in-12.html

Apparently, it is, for better or worse, Mittens who fares best in 2012 matchups.

EDIT: Haha, the first comment on that article could be written about this forum:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sorry, I'll trust Rasmussen over a hack site.

Come on, 538's pretty well respected. We're not talking about Daily Kos here.

Obama +10 is ridiculous. Obama's popularity is sinking by the hour.

The election's two years away. Reagan was less popular at this point, for example.

More to the point, (IMO) Paul's philosophy isn't "electable". I know we disagree on that, obviously...

Uh, Paul's philosophy is the only one left untried and untarnished after 12 years of BushBama.

Not to be crass, but they haven't tried, say, fascism, yet but it doesn't mean people want it. It's simple, really.

If you ask someone about "big government", their knee jerk reaction will be that of opposition, but start asking that hypothetical person about highways and Medicare and the Civil Rights Act(s) and their opinion may just change.

Of course we tried fascism. That's what is in power right now.

You cannot be serious. *facepalm*

Sorry, can you respectfully state what your objection is to my post?

Sure.

The idea the United States is currently under fascist rule is, I've gotta say, downright offensive to people who've lived under, y'know, actual fascist rule.

Offensive to Americans? Barack Obama is a fascist. That's a fact.
I guess we should just take your word for it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.