What would have happenned had Lincoln not been shot? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 09:44:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  What would have happenned had Lincoln not been shot? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What would have happenned had Lincoln not been shot?  (Read 5283 times)
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« on: June 24, 2005, 01:08:08 PM »

In 1866 Lincoiln would have a run in with Congress over Reconstruction. Lincoln's passive pro-South Reconstruction policy would have been torn to shreds by radicals like Charles Sumner of MA and Thad Stevens of PA. Lincoln would not have been put up for impeachment, by relations between him and Congress would have been severed.

Blacks would be treated pretty much the same, but former Confederates would have been spared the brunt of Radical reconstruction.

14th and 15th Amendments would still have been passed, but probabaly better enforced by Old Abe than by Andrew Johnson.

In 1868 the Radical Wing of the Republican Party elects Senator Charles Sumner as President and the Radical Reconstruction Poliocy hits full tilt. By 1880 federal troops leave the South as a ploy to win votes for President John Sherman's reelection.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2005, 09:33:11 AM »

Well thank God this didn't actually happen. Lincoln was absolutely a horrible man and president. I wouldn't even want to think how "reconstruction" (ie terrorism on the south) would have been had Lincoln not been spared from the nation.

His Reconstruction would have been more lenient than Johnson's.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2005, 05:33:57 PM »

Well thank God this didn't actually happen. Lincoln was absolutely a horrible man and president. I wouldn't even want to think how "reconstruction" (ie terrorism on the south) would have been had Lincoln not been spared from the nation.

His Reconstruction would have been more lenient than Johnson's.

Look how the tyrant dictated during the war. You know with his shutting down of the free press, illegal seizures and false imprisonment. Tell me how the tyrant would have changed post war? That bullet that mercifully entered that "mans" head saved thousands of lives and probably the future of the USA as we know it now.

That was durring the war, and was needed to win the war IMHO.

Didn't you even read Lincoln's second inaugural "With malice toward none and charity for all"? Or perhaps you have forgotten he was willing to allow anystate back into the Union if they would simply ask tpo be let in.

He denied the Radical Republican "Virginia Acts" that took away all voting rights from the white men of the South. He would have been much more lenient on the South than Johnson.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.