Why was the '88 Dem field so weak? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 10:05:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was the '88 Dem field so weak? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was the '88 Dem field so weak?  (Read 3401 times)
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

« on: January 01, 2010, 01:31:56 PM »

I'm guessing many prominent Democrats excepted Bush Sr. to easily win in both 1988 (which he did) and 1992 (which he didn't) and thus they decided against running what they thought would be a futile race.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2010, 09:26:59 PM »

I'm guessing many prominent Democrats excepted Bush Sr. to easily win in both 1988 (which he did) and 1992 (which he didn't) and thus they decided against running what they thought would be a futile race.

No, actually; Many Democrats saw 1988 as leaning in their favor, for reasons probably known to you (Iran-Contra, National Debt, etc.), but all of their good potential candidates, Biden, Cuomo, Hart, all had either shot themselves in the foot or decided not to run. 1988 was probably going to go the Republican anyway with either of those candidates, but many expected the Democrats to win.

I agree with you about the factors that favored the Democrats in 1988, but you forgot to mention two very important factors that favored Bush Sr. that year: the good economy (unemployment that year was between 5 and 6% pretty low/average levels) and the fact that the U.S. was not involved in any foreign wars. These two factors greatly helped Bush Sr. overtake Dukakis's lead throughout the fall, when many people began to pay more attention to the election (and the economy and foreign affairs). I know Dukakis's mistakes greatly hurt his campaign, but I think that Bush Sr. would have had a very large boost in his support and popularity throguhout the fall (possibly enough to win the election) regardless of who his opnent would have been.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2010, 10:31:44 PM »

Possibly, but I think Bush still would have won narrowly.

Certainly, but Dukakis was up 17 points in July; an experienced guy like Cuomo probably could have held that lead.

I'm not so sure someone like Cuomo could have retained that lead when many people actually began to pay attention to the election throughout the Fall. The same case occured in 2000, when Bush led Gore by double-digits until the summer, and then when people began to pay attention to the race in the fall Bush's lead began decreasing.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.