1984: Bentsen/Glenn vs. Reagan/Bush (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 24, 2024, 08:47:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1984: Bentsen/Glenn vs. Reagan/Bush (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1984: Bentsen/Glenn vs. Reagan/Bush  (Read 3355 times)
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

« on: May 17, 2010, 11:39:30 PM »



Still a large Reagan win due to the economic recovery and the dramatically reduced inflation rate.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2010, 06:09:45 PM »

http://


Minnesota almost went to Reagan even with Mondale running. I give MA and RI to the dems because Mondale was a very poor candidate. I can't imagine anyone doing worse than he did.

Mondale was a crappy candidate and John Glenn was a true American hero. I can't see Glenn doing that badly.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2010, 07:17:09 PM »

http://


Minnesota almost went to Reagan even with Mondale running. I give MA and RI to the dems because Mondale was a very poor candidate. I can't imagine anyone doing worse than he did.

Mondale was a crappy candidate and John Glenn was a true American hero. I can't see Glenn doing that badly.

Right but he's not the candidate, Lloyd Bentsen is. He wasn't as bad either but Reagan is Reagan.

Bensten also wasn't nearly as bad of a candidate as Mondale was.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2010, 09:36:38 PM »

I really, really doubt Reagan was going to lose electoral votes in 1984. No incumbent president has won re-election with fewer electoral votes than his first election except Woodrow Wilson. It's an extremely rare case when something like that happens, and I don't think a wildly popular President (who was more popular than in 1980) was going to win re-election with less electoral votes than his first election. In conclusion, I don't see Reagan winning any less than 489 electoral votes.

Carter lost some EVs due to Anderson running. A good Democratic candidate might thus have gotten more EVs than Carter since no strong third-party liberal candidate would have run in 1984.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.