SCOTUS nominee expected as early as this morning EDIT: looks like it's Garland (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 10:14:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  SCOTUS nominee expected as early as this morning EDIT: looks like it's Garland (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SCOTUS nominee expected as early as this morning EDIT: looks like it's Garland  (Read 14338 times)
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


« on: March 18, 2016, 06:44:25 PM »

If we have to have a moderate, let it be a Manchin/JBE type who would vote to overturn Roe and uphold Heller.

Overturning Roe isn't moderate...
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2016, 02:42:02 AM »

This guy is against the rights of people to keep and bare arms as witnessed by Judge Garland wanting to reconsider the ruling D.C. vs Heller


They shouldnt even give him a chance.  Hes a trojan horse.

Any judge that is willing to reconsider Heller and possibly reverse it should receive immediate confirmation to the Supreme Court. 
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2016, 05:40:16 PM »

This guy is against the rights of people to keep and bare arms as witnessed by Judge Garland wanting to reconsider the ruling D.C. vs Heller


They shouldnt even give him a chance.  Hes a trojan horse.

Any judge that is willing to reconsider Heller and possibly reverse it should receive immediate confirmation to the Supreme Court. 

So you support Judges that don't uphold the constitution ?       But let the courts decide not to uphold SSM and you libs go crazy. 

Sometimes I wish John Kerry was elected President in 04. Imagine if he was able to appoint 2 Justices, instead of Bush. So many poor decisions would now be different. Heller, Citizens United, the Alabama VRA case, etc. I don't even care if he would have lost in 2008, the impact on the court would be worth it. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.