care to explain the methodology?
First I complied a massive list of artists and influential non-performers (producers, song-writers, executives, etc.). I looked at where the musican/non-performer started there musical career. This process took me a couple weeks. Then I ranked the states based on the following criteria:
- Centers of music (length of time as a center, importance, number) (New York City, Los Angeles, Nashville, New Orleans, etc)
- Genres associated with the state (Bluegrass-Kentucky, Jazz-Lousiana and New York, Blues-Mississippi and Illinois, etc)
- Legends (Imporant acts are weighed more)
- Then number of acts that I could find
Mississippi not in the top ten?
Mississippi was difficult to rank because it was the home of the Delta Blues, but many of the acts from area where born and raised in Mississippi but went north, mainly to Chicago and Chess Records, to start their music careers. I'll relook at the list, I could see moving MS up to 11.
Not putting Mississippi at #1 is crazy. Without the Delta blues and Elvis, America's popular music would be unrecognizable.
I gave Elvis to Tenessee as he moved there at age 13 well before he stared his musical career.