SENATE BILL: The It's Not Up To You Act (Law'd)

[Gass3268]

I support this bill as is. I would hate to see it get watered down.

[Gass3268]

I would certainly support your amendment Polnut. The repeal of the ban, can stand on its own merits just as easily in an amendment vote as a final vote.

Also it might help to state what the amendment was aiming to achieve, as I have noticed an unfortunate need to spoon feed people such information.
https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Late-Term_Abortion_Restriction_Act

What's your point? As the bill's name clearly states, it's not up to you to put restrictions on women and their doctors... at any point of the process. As Senator Napoleon has said, abortions should be SAFE, LEGAL, and RARE. This bill does that.

[Gass3268]

I would certainly support your amendment Polnut. The repeal of the ban, can stand on its own merits just as easily in an amendment vote as a final vote.

Also it might help to state what the amendment was aiming to achieve, as I have noticed an unfortunate need to spoon feed people such information.
https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Late-Term_Abortion_Restriction_Act

What's your point? As the bill's name clearly states, it's not up to you to put restrictions on women and their doctors... at any point of the process. As Senator Napoleon has said, abortions should be SAFE, LEGAL, and RARE. This bill does that.

Polnut's amendment revokes a specific section of a previous bill, and presumes that others know what that section is. I have reached the conclusion that too few are that attentative and thus provided the link, especially when I got the vibe from Polnut of "well too few are interested in this amendment, so....".

Is it also not up to you to use the Gov't to protect the weak?

You're assuming that a fetus is a person, which is a pretty big assumption to make.

Exactly

[Gass3268]

I would certainly support your amendment Polnut. The repeal of the ban, can stand on its own merits just as easily in an amendment vote as a final vote.

Also it might help to state what the amendment was aiming to achieve, as I have noticed an unfortunate need to spoon feed people such information.
https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Late-Term_Abortion_Restriction_Act

What's your point? As the bill's name clearly states, it's not up to you to put restrictions on women and their doctors... at any point of the process. As Senator Napoleon has said, abortions should be SAFE, LEGAL, and RARE. This bill does that.

Polnut's amendment revokes a specific section of a previous bill, and presumes that others know what that section is. I have reached the conclusion that too few are that attentative and thus provided the link, especially when I got the vibe from Polnut of "well too few are interested in this amendment, so....".

Is it also not up to you to use the Gov't to protect the weak?

You're assuming that a fetus is a person, which is a pretty big assumption to make.

I don't think so, considering that in the time frame we are discussing here, many would be able to survive outside of the womb.

But its still a fetus, not a person

[Gass3268]

It's unfortunate that this could not go farther, but this is better then the current version.

Aye