Senate Bill: Pacific Crisis Stimulus Act (Enacted) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 01:37:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Senate Bill: Pacific Crisis Stimulus Act (Enacted) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Senate Bill: Pacific Crisis Stimulus Act (Enacted)  (Read 7335 times)
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« on: July 11, 2013, 03:23:11 PM »

Something like this:

I - Federal backing for Pacific debt
II - $50-100 billion for the Pacific (distributed by IA to Pacific Region based on Senate-established guidelines)
III - $50-100 billion for the other regions (distributed by IA to other four regions based on Senate-established guidelines)

Don't forget that deeming the NM-AM a terrorist organization is essential to any rebuilding in the region.

Invoking Godwin: you don't end the Holocaust and let the Nazi Party continue to rule.

Except NM-AM isn't a terrorist organization...
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2013, 12:06:11 PM »

I offer the fallowing amendment:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It is very likely that officials associated with Pacific Rimjob are still going to be on the Pacific Council, even after the upcoming recalls. I don't see how we can allow some elected officials on the Council to handle how the money is spent, with others being barred to do so. Appears to me to be impossible and probably grounds for a legal dispute.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2013, 02:02:35 PM »

I am fine with it. It should be obvious that those who are responsible for the mess shouldn't be Involved in the cleanup.

How can we legally do that if they are still on the Council after the recalls?
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2013, 11:35:54 AM »
« Edited: July 16, 2013, 11:39:08 AM by Senator Gass3268 »

I'm cool with it, if we can remove 1.4.3. Way too many issues and potential issues in that clause.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2013, 04:57:36 PM »

I can't support this if Section 1.4.3 is removed. There is no point in letting the people who caused this have more money to do more damage with. Simply, that's insane. These creeps are still bragging about causing a recession.

So what do we do if a NM-AM member remains on the Council after the recalls? Will they not be able to be engaged in how the money is spent? That doesn't seem legal. 
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2013, 04:40:58 PM »

I would recommend you to give the money of the Pacific Region to the Department of Internal Affairs. If the NM-AM wins, then I will directly spend the money dodging the Regional Government. If they are not elected to the Council or to the Governorship, the money will go freely to the Regional Government.

This is viewpoint discrimination.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2013, 06:48:31 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 12 queries.