National swing of states 2004-2012 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 08:15:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  National swing of states 2004-2012 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: National swing of states 2004-2012  (Read 5007 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« on: November 17, 2014, 02:15:31 PM »

County swing map:



Trend:

Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2014, 04:44:33 PM »

What's the difference between the two county maps? What's the second one showing?

^ Trend is the county swing compared to the national swing.

E.g, if a county swung 5% to Obama it would trending 2% R.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2014, 03:02:28 AM »

4. The NC mountains (outside of Asheville) look overdue for a hard right shift.  There were hints of this in the Tillis win.  If it happens, it would be enough to take NC back off the map for a while.

The NC mountains contain a negligible number of voters. As long as urban areas continue to trend Democratic, North Carolina will remain a swing state.

This. Many mountain/piedmont counties are 1) already 65%+ R, so not much room to swing right and 2) growing slower than the rest of the state.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2014, 01:03:11 PM »

^ I wouldn't have thought so by looking at the county map, but IA as a whole is actually trending D (very slightly). The rural GOP areas are losing influence but I wonder how the suburbanization will compensate for that, going forward.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2014, 02:18:43 PM »

Where would you say the Democrats' future lies?

Generally speaking, a coastal coalition seems most feasible. With the exception of SC, they should aim to win every state that borders the Atlantic ocean, from ME to FL.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2014, 03:00:40 PM »

Where would you say the Democrats' future lies?

Generally speaking, a coastal coalition seems most feasible. With the exception of SC, they should aim to win every state that borders the Atlantic ocean, from ME to FL.

Plus the inner west states (New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada).

Yes. I forgot to say they already have the west coast, with those three being almost an extension of that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 11 queries.