The High Speed Rail Act (Awaiting Presidential Signature/Veto) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 07:30:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The High Speed Rail Act (Awaiting Presidential Signature/Veto) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The High Speed Rail Act (Awaiting Presidential Signature/Veto)  (Read 4355 times)
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,788
United States


« on: March 30, 2009, 09:14:36 AM »

I support high speed rail but this bill isn't that good. Get rid of the tax increases and forcing the regions to pay.

What I'd suggest is having an auction where a private company or companies could come in and work with the federal and regional governments to construct these railways.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,788
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2009, 11:43:43 AM »

I'd suggest adding Milwaukee as a stop on the St. Louis-Chicago line. Smiley
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,788
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2009, 11:46:33 AM »

I'd suggest adding Milwaukee as a stop on the St. Louis-Chicago line. Smiley

OMG Earmark!

Actually, that would make a lot of sense.

Haha, considering Milwaukee has sh**t of a railroad system and is pretty much tied for the highest bus fairs in the country it could help a lot.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,788
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2009, 09:41:06 PM »

Glad to hear the positive comments about the modified version.

Would anybody like to propose any amendments to what is now written? I'm certainly open to quite a bit, as I would definitely like to get this bill through.

I'd like 2 changes:

Minneapolis, MN- St. Louis, MO- Chicago, IL- Milwaukee, WI- Minneapolis, MN

and

San Diego, CA- Los Angeles, CA- San Fransicso, CA- Portland, OR- Seattle, WA
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,788
United States


« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2009, 09:47:50 PM »

Glad to hear the positive comments about the modified version.

Would anybody like to propose any amendments to what is now written? I'm certainly open to quite a bit, as I would definitely like to get this bill through.

I'd like 2 changes:

Minneapolis, MN- St. Louis, MO- Chicago, IL- Milwaukee, WI- Minneapolis, MN

and

San Diego, CA- Los Angeles, CA- San Fransicso, CA- Portland, OR- Seattle, WA

     Hopefully that unfortunate misspelling does not make it into the final version of the bill. Wink

Haha, it's been a long day for me, he can fix it if he likes the idea (I hope) and adds it to his amendment. Tongue
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,788
United States


« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2009, 12:10:23 AM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.