Dallasfan65's MA Town Map Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 10:35:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Dallasfan65's MA Town Map Thread (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
Author Topic: Dallasfan65's MA Town Map Thread  (Read 161832 times)
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #50 on: June 08, 2011, 11:12:07 PM »

Many thanks to homelycooking! He combined the '64 results.

Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #51 on: June 09, 2011, 03:35:47 PM »

Thanks HC! Smiley

@shua, sadly I do not have Vermont data going back that early. Which is a shame, since it'd be one of my favorites to do. Sad
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #52 on: June 09, 2011, 10:23:05 PM »
« Edited: June 10, 2011, 12:09:55 AM by Dallasfan65 »



And what a way to kick off my 4500th post! Smiley
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #53 on: June 10, 2011, 09:08:47 PM »

Again, great work.  Smiley 

Just a friendly fyi though, I think you got New Haven wrong.  Wink 

Newbie mistake! Wink

That should be 60% D, not 60% R. I must have been pretty burnt out. I'll rectify it tomorrow.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #54 on: June 10, 2011, 11:35:56 PM »

Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #55 on: June 12, 2011, 11:09:32 PM »

Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #56 on: June 13, 2011, 11:26:38 PM »



Back to the Bay State for a bit.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #57 on: June 16, 2011, 08:39:49 PM »



Looks like he didn't fare quite as well in the re-match.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #58 on: June 29, 2011, 08:38:57 PM »
« Edited: August 04, 2012, 09:15:24 AM by Dallasfan65 »



Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #59 on: June 29, 2011, 09:17:42 PM »

Solid work!

(Democratic wins in northern Grafton County - forestry/mining?)

Merci!

And yes, I think that is the most plausible explanation... my best example being Livermore, NH (now unpopulated)

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #60 on: July 05, 2011, 06:07:30 PM »



I'll tackle Maine later.

Credit: Al for having done Massachusetts, homelycooking for having done Connecticut.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #61 on: September 13, 2011, 08:52:58 PM »



May not be doing this quite as often since I've been uploading stuff to the database, but I'll take requests.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #62 on: November 28, 2011, 07:38:34 PM »

Here's some fun:

Amherst, Massachusetts:

1976: Carter, 61.46%
1972: McGovern, 67.72%
1968: Humphrey, 56.10%
1964: Johnson, 68.04%
1960: Nixon, 59.40%
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #63 on: November 28, 2011, 07:57:07 PM »


Smiley

I was just on a 'break', got a little sideways with my timeline (which is very map-intensive.) Doesn't mean I can't do requests and stuff still. Smiley
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #64 on: November 28, 2011, 08:45:40 PM »

A great thread is resurrected! Marvelous.

Dallas, do you have data from state legislative races in 2006, 2008 or 2010?

I do not. Sad

I could attempt to find them, though.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #65 on: November 28, 2011, 09:37:21 PM »

Here's some fun:

Amherst, Massachusetts:

1976: Carter, 61.46%
1972: McGovern, 67.72%
1968: Humphrey, 56.10%
1964: Johnson, 68.04%
1960: Nixon, 59.40%

WOW. The whole Civil Rights debacle sure had an unforgiving impact on this town.

No, just a massive influx of college kids - Eugene McCarthy got 6% there in 1976. Smiley

Anyway, a work in progress: Be advised that the city splits were mostly guess work (except of course for the Boston district lumped in with Norfolk - presumably Hyde Park.)



1912 State Representative elections. To be completed tomorrow.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #66 on: November 29, 2011, 06:40:36 PM »

And she is done!



State Representative races.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #67 on: November 29, 2011, 07:42:54 PM »
« Edited: November 29, 2011, 08:03:29 PM by Dallasfan65 »

A Tale of Three Cities:

Fall River:
1900: McKinley, 57.57%
1904: Roosevelt, 49.69%
1908: Taft, 51.67%
1912: Wilson, 39.09%
1916: Wilson, 50.04%
1920: Harding, 64.37%
1924: Coolidge, 56.62%
1928: Smith, 61.46%
1932: Roosevelt, 61.65%

New Bedford:
1900: McKinley, 63.24%
1904: Roosevelt, 58.08%
1908: Taft, 58.33%
1912: Taft, 41.37%
1916: Hughes, 52.31%
1920: Harding, 78.13%
1924: Coolidge, 66.17%
1928: Smith, 52.88%
1932: Roosevelt, 57.88%

Cambridge:
1900: McKinley, 50.99%
1904: Parker, 48.85%
1908: Taft, 51.54%
1912: Wilson, 48.67%
1916: Wilson, 55.64%
1920: Harding, 58.15%
1924: Coolidge, 49.47%
1928: Smith, 60.93%
1932: Roosevelt, 60.86%

Also, a personal favorite of mine (though not a city by any stretch of the imagination):

Heath:
1960: Nixon, 73.71%
1964: Goldwater, 51.79%
1968: Nixon, 72.72%
1972: Nixon, 65.51%
1976: Ford, 46.66%
1980: Reagan, 44.25%
1984: Mondale, 54.13%
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #68 on: November 29, 2011, 09:30:37 PM »

Can you give us one of Bedford Falls?

It's A Wonderful Life? Tongue


This is beautiful! Why the Republican strength in Springfield? And what happened in Haverhill to make the people there elect a Socialist?


Springfield was one of the more Republican-leaning towns at the time - Lodge even won it against Kennedy, if my memory serves me correctly.

The Haverhill election was a race between a dual-ballot line Progressive Republican and a Socialist. I'm supposing the Socialist received most of the Democratic vote as an anti-Republican vote and won, although I should check the previous and subsequent elections.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #69 on: November 30, 2011, 12:54:28 AM »

Interesting results from Heath. It seems that McCarthy and Anderson delayed the inevitable swing to the Democrats. Was it all from an influx of college kids?

That would be Amherst, actually. Smiley

Heath was just the Vermont of it's time, but that's another subject.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #70 on: November 30, 2011, 03:43:29 PM »
« Edited: November 30, 2011, 03:47:05 PM by Dallasfan65 »

A Tale of Three Cities:

Fall River:
1900: McKinley, 57.57%
1904: Roosevelt, 49.69%
1908: Taft, 51.67%
1912: Wilson, 39.09%
1916: Wilson, 50.04%
1920: Harding, 64.37%
1924: Coolidge, 56.62%
1928: Smith, 61.46%
1932: Roosevelt, 61.65%

New Bedford:
1900: McKinley, 63.24%
1904: Roosevelt, 58.08%
1908: Taft, 58.33%
1912: Taft, 41.37%
1916: Hughes, 52.31%
1920: Harding, 78.13%
1924: Coolidge, 66.17%
1928: Smith, 52.88%
1932: Roosevelt, 57.88%

Cambridge:
1900: McKinley, 50.99%
1904: Parker, 48.85%
1908: Taft, 51.54%
1912: Wilson, 48.67%
1916: Wilson, 55.64%
1920: Harding, 58.15%
1924: Coolidge, 49.47%
1928: Smith, 60.93%
1932: Roosevelt, 60.86%

Also, a personal favorite of mine (though not a city by any stretch of the imagination):

Heath:
1960: Nixon, 73.71%
1964: Goldwater, 51.79%
1968: Nixon, 72.72%
1972: Nixon, 65.51%
1976: Ford, 46.66%
1980: Reagan, 44.25%
1984: Mondale, 54.13%

Cambridge went for Smith?
By damn near 61%?

Must be a lot more micks and papists living there then I gave the place credit for.

Cambridge was originally an industrial city, but as manufacturing decayed in New England became depressed and decided to be an intellectual haven instead. I guess it is like an early version of Duluth, although I am still a little too ignorant of Minnesota to make such a claim.

Thus why it has remained Democratic the whole time - as I've illustrated earlier in this thread, Eisenhower only lost it by a few hundred votes. Bill Weld won it in 1990, but not in 1994.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #71 on: December 14, 2011, 04:45:35 PM »

Excellent work Dallasfan :-). Can you post a stats of how the city  of Fitchburg and the town of Lancaster voted?

Thanks! Smiley

Sure, how far back?
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #72 on: December 24, 2011, 02:22:47 PM »

At least to 1900 and include presidential primaries, senator elections, gubernatorial elections, with including Leominster as well.

Fitchburg will be done in a few of days. Smiley

In the mean time...

Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #73 on: December 25, 2011, 03:46:56 PM »
« Edited: August 04, 2012, 09:21:12 AM by Dallasfan65 »

Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« Reply #74 on: December 25, 2011, 05:40:27 PM »

Wow, I didn't expected Stevenson winning Leominster/Fitchburg if I'm reading the 1952 map correctly. From what I've occurred it's seem like a conservative Democrat districts.

Actually, that was his appeal.

Look at this map (courtesy of homelycooking)



Reagan won both of those despite winning by a lesser margin. Blackstone, MA voted for John Davis when literally no other town in Massachusetts did, yet gave Reagan 55% of the vote. (The first time it ever voted Republican for President, I believe.)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 12 queries.