Two of the biggest Trump derangement syndrome sufferers write a hit piece against Trump in the Jeff Bezos blog, a publication notorious for its serial fake news stories attacking Trump. Do you have anything from a credible source.
Everything you people don't like is fake news. That's the real derangement syndrome.
I'm not going to get into an argument about where the term "fake news" originated. That's not even close to the discussion here, so I won't engage with you on that--I don't understand why you brought it up, unless it was to detract from the fact you just don't have a good counterargument for my point that you guys label everything as "fake news" if it isn't pro-Trump.
Is there is any legitimate piece of media or news that has reported facts about Trump which have been seen negatively that you do not consider to be fake news?There is no doubt that both sides have labeled certain new stories as fake news. Sure, it happens sometimes in politics. The difference here is that your side is labeling
everything that you don't like as being fake news. Your side has overused the label to the point it's just laughable and not seen even remotely as a valid defense against negative media. Your leader literally labels entire organizations as fake. Verifiable fact has been labeled as fake. The president is a small man with no backbone who cannot justify his own statements and actions and therefore says that anything which suggests he might've done something wrong is fake; and that is absurd. It can't
all be fake with you guys.
Frankly I don't understand how you can be so oblivious to all the evidence that this is a cooked up political witch hunt. Obviously cooked up political witch hunts do happen and there is plenty of evidence that this is one of them. What exactly would it take for you to start to suspect that that is what's going on here?
Seriously. Let's look at the evidence. The FBI's total reliance on the dodgy Crowdstrike report and its complete failure to examine the DNC servers to verify any of Crowdstrike's claims. The reliance on a clearly fake dossier cooked up at the request of a Dem linked opposed research company. The ever expanding investigation run by a close friend of one of the key witnesses (in a total and clear conflict of interest) branching out in every direction because the original Trump/Russia interference/collusion story is falling apart for lack of credible evidence.
Seriously. At what point would you start to think 'this is looking less like evidence against Trump and more like evidence of a partisan witch hunt'. What would it take for you to start considering that possibility.
Where is the evidence (please link me a legitimate source) that indicates the Russian collusion accusation is a partisan witch hunt? I am genuinely interested, because if it turns out that the Democrats have fabricated this entire story, then that is another discussion and one in which I will eat my own words. I will not stand by a party that accuses the president (even one I do not like) of treason (because, if true, that's exactly what this is). That's a serious accusation, and it's one that should not be made lightly as a means to score political points. And if that's all this investigation is, it's clear that it hasn't gained the Dems anything yet--in fact, the opposite is more likely so far.
But if it turns out this entire Russia thing was just a made up story, thought up by some DNC hack, then yea, I will be dead set against that. Until you enlighten me, though, I haven't seen any indication that this is only a partisan witch hunt. I await your legitimately sourced evidence.
Now if it turns out someone in Trump's campaign DID collude with Russia, will you make the same concessions that I have and denounce such activities as treasonous and deserving of some kind of serious punishment? And if the president knew about it (which would make him just as guilty), will you pledge to call for impeachment?
But anyway.....
--Team Trump have repeatedly denied ties to Russia and repeatedly been caught lying about their denials
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/03/02/trump-teams-many-many-denials-contacts-russia/98625780/--Roger Stone had advanced knowledge of Russia's disclosure through WikiLeaks about Hillary's e-mails
https://twitter.com/rogerjstonejr/status/767366825743097856?lang=en--"We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia"--DJT, Jr.
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/05/trump-lawyers-up-conflicts-of-interest/526185/--Michael Flynn's repeated contacts with Russia
https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/02/flynn-resigns-timeline/516594/--Jeff Sessions forced to recuse himself from the investigation amid controversy and lies regarding his contacts with Russia
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/us/politics/jeff-sessions-russia-trump-investigation-democrats.html--Jared Kushner's attempt to establish back channel communications between the White House and the Russian government
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/27/jared-kushner-russia-backchannel-protocol-238888--Carter Page being linked as a central figure between Trump and Russia
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-campaign-advisor-carter-page-targeted-russian-spies/story?id=46557506....and monitored by the FBI, after they obtained a FISA warrant (which is incredibly difficult to obtain)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-obtained-fisa-warrant-to-monitor-former-trump-adviser-carter-page/2017/04/11/620192ea-1e0e-11e7-ad74-3a742a6e93a7_story.html?utm_term=.0767390cf006--Not to mention Trump's ridiculous and repeated defense/praise of Putin, who is a dictator willing to murder his own people
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/03/politics/trump-putin-russia-timeline/There are more, but I haven't the time right now to keep posting. And any one of these would be cause for concern, though not necessarily damning; but when you put them all together you have cause for a serious and thorough investigation--because stacked together along with the knowledge of the fact that Russia did influence the election to favor Trump, it points to something nefarious having occurred.
