This supports some of your claims but shows that the crunch shouldn't happen until 2012.
http://www.microsoft.com/enable/aging/demographics.aspxhttp://www.nowcc.org/issues/report.htmlThis is interesting too. But however you spin it 96000 is dismal.
Year Population Difference Av. Inc/Month
1930 122,775,046
1940 131,669,275 8,894,229 74,118
1950 151,330,000 19,660,725 163,839 (retiring)
1960 179,322,000 27,992,000 233,266
1970 203,302,031 23,970,031 199,750
1980 226,545,805 23,243,774 193,698 (entering)
1990 248,765,170 22,219,365 185,161
2000 267,636,061 18,870,891 157,257
So the boom was definately a big increase but I think more women in Gen X are entering into the workplace than then and the average retirement age is being pused up to 65 which means that it is still those born between 1940 and 1950 that are retiring and that decade had a montly increase of 30000 less than the people that are currently entering into employment. I'm not saying it won't become a problem but I really don't think that retirement is a good excuse for the lack of job creation.