Weekly jobless claims hit nine-month high. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 07:07:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Weekly jobless claims hit nine-month high. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Weekly jobless claims hit nine-month high.  (Read 1482 times)
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


« on: August 19, 2010, 01:39:02 PM »


Precisely.  The government is not creating jobs.  That is what we need it to do.
Government does not exist to create jobs, what its to do is create the environment for jobs to be created in the private sector.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2010, 10:11:36 AM »


No, clearly we need to lay off a few million teachers etc. because otherwise we'd have to borrow money at 0.1% to pay them.
Why is it that teachers, firefighters, police ect, are the first people that the left always threaten to lay-off if a new tax isn't created or if a huge spending bill isn't passed? I'd like to think there are plenty of less vital public sector jobs that could be laid off before we get to that point. Maybe there would be more room in the budget for teacher if the teachers unions were not suing the districts for tax payer funded viagra, the cost of which equals the salary of 12 teachers.


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
It isn't a myth but is tragically close to becoming one due to government feeling a constant need to stick its nose where it doesn't belong.
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2010, 01:40:44 PM »

I'm not pro-government; I'm pro-growth. But looking at the evidence, there seems to be no growth in the private sector (Where's the hiring, Fortune 500 companies?), and therefore the government should step in and take over. Meritocracy. We'll hire Mr. Private Sector first always, we'll give him Affirmative Action. But if he's not doing his job, we have no choice but to switch over to Mr. Government. The best argument against government is for the private sector to pick up the pace.
But take a step back and look at the larger picture, before you hire Mr. Government to put out the fire look and see that it was government involvement that caused the fire to happen. Great example would be in the housing market where the Clinton administration pressured Fannie Mae to loan to people who's incomes or credit ratings made them ineligible, this became general practice and we all know what happened to the housing market years later.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.