Women in combat (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 08:47:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Women in combat (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should females be allowed to fight in combat alongside men?
#1
Yes, it's a women's rights issue
 
#2
No, it's a distraction for men
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 32

Author Topic: Women in combat  (Read 5133 times)
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,240


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« on: April 15, 2005, 08:49:57 PM »

let me just put it very simply:

Vietcong = women fighters
US Army = no women fightrers (at th etime)

who won?

More ignorance from BRTD, who only days ago said the USSR was losing the Cold War in 1980 and its fall was inevitable.

In VIetnam, the US killed 12 NVA and VC soldiers for every 1 loss.  On the battlefield, the NVA and VC could not cut it.  It was in the political arena where the US lost.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,240


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2005, 09:03:15 PM »

As for the question in the thread, no women should not be allowed in combat.  They lack the physical strength of men.  Remember, a five foot nothing grandmother was charged with guarding a six foot black man as he entered an Atlanta Courtroom a few weeks ago, and we all know how that turned out.

Female cops are more likely to resort to using their guns than male cops as well.  Gee, why is that?  Could it be thaqt, cognizant of their physical inferiority to male perpetrators, they don't feel confident enough to use proper protocol?  Or that they are physically incapable of using proper protocol?

When will this nonsense social experimentation stop?
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,240


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2005, 09:37:24 PM »

Female cops are more likely to resort to using their guns than male cops as well.  Gee, why is that?  Could it be thaqt, cognizant of their physical inferiority to male perpetrators, they don't feel confident enough to use proper protocol?  Or that they are physically incapable of using proper protocol?

well on the battlefield everyone uses guns, so it's a moot point.

Are you saying that you, a male, would not be afraid of a FARC girl?

Not really, if we were equally armed.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,240


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2005, 10:03:23 PM »

yes. plenty of communist guerilla insurgencies are 30-40% women and they have no problems. Hell, the Vietcong included women in combat, the US didn't, and the Vietcong still kicked the US's ass.

Yeah, we completely destroyed their infastructre, killed nearly 80% of all their soldiers, yet they kicked our asses. Take a history lesson BRTD.

If Johnson would have just used all our firepower we would have won that war in 6 weeks.

Actually, six weeks was the exact timetable that Clark Clifford laid out as Secretary of Defense in 1968 for how long an invasion of the North would take to complete.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.