Kerry calls terrorism a nuisance? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 10:13:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  Kerry calls terrorism a nuisance? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Kerry calls terrorism a nuisance?  (Read 7820 times)
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« on: October 10, 2004, 05:23:20 PM »

I guess Kerry wanted to make the campaign more challenging for his handlers.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2004, 05:32:37 PM »


Terrorism is no more than a nuisance right now...

All you need to hear to know that Democrats can't be trusted with national security.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2004, 05:35:09 PM »

He is correct, like it or not, terrorism can never be ended. Anyone who thinks it can be universally wiped out is one naive fool.

So human developement is a prolonged stasis, never changing course?  How can you seriously argue that?
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2004, 07:44:25 PM »

What is the point of terrorism?  Can it bring a mandate?   Can it build economies?  Can it stop poverty and hunger?  Can terrorism end social ills?   Can terrorism stop the proliferation of WMD? Can you sit across a table from "it" and negotiate the peace?  Can it peacefully co-exist with anybody not of their ilk or persuasion?  Do terrorist add anything to the political dialogue?  If you answer yes to any of those questions, you are living in never never land.  

It does all these things potentially - by winning wars.  America won world war II partially due to a successful tactic of terrorism.  We mad e a consicous effor to slaughter hundreds of thousands of 'civilians' and made many more homeless or crippled, in order to win though fear.

Suggesting the US employed terrorism to win WWII is really an extreme view.

It was policy.

What exactly are you referring to?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.