The Public White House: Constitutional Convention at FINAL VOTE! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 11:02:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Public White House: Constitutional Convention at FINAL VOTE! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Public White House: Constitutional Convention at FINAL VOTE!  (Read 21930 times)
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« on: June 28, 2010, 01:15:40 AM »

I wish to congratulate these members on their appointments.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2010, 09:47:04 AM »

Thank you to all well wishers, I will do my best.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2010, 04:09:07 AM »

Can we not spam this thread
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« Reply #3 on: October 07, 2010, 05:20:50 AM »

As a community, we've turned Atlasia into a country we are all comfortable with.

The reason things get personal is that there is no more ideology left to debate.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2010, 09:45:50 PM »

I think one of the reasons the game fails TBH is the whole fact that it is american. US politics was designed to allow individuals rights and the ability to stand up for good bills. While that is a "good" thing it is not very "fun".

Compare to example, Canada.

Political Parties here are private entities. The Leader can throw you out of the party - for life - by decree. Therefore if you are an MP, you want to be in the party, because Independents very rarely get elected here. When your party has a majority that effectively means that your leader is Dictator. Of course, he must keep his party happy, or the party and it's MP's can toss the leader aside. All the action takes place in Parliament, in the House of Commons, where you have legislators, cabinet members, and the nation's leader all at one another's throats day in day out. Now that is fun, but not very productive.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2010, 09:52:16 PM »

That brings me back to my original point that people are comfortable with the nation as it is.

On each issue, 55% of people are happy. However, there are so many issues that by the end of it, no one is happy with everything.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2010, 04:55:53 AM »

If people are truly "tired" perhaps it's time for the R word.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2010, 12:30:52 AM »

There's that R word.

I've presided over a few of them, and if you need any help, I am here.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2010, 04:55:07 AM »

The only way to properly do the R word is to start from scratch.

That means all of us suddenly find ourselves in a large constitutional convention. There would be no Senate to debate measures because one has not been created yet. We'd have to create the regions (if we even want regions) from scratch (though one would presume that the existing regions would certainly be a popular choice) and we would need to decide what kind of government we even want, a presidential system like we have, or a more parliamentary system where everyone who is anyone sits in the Senate. Do we even want a President? How about a King or a Sultan? Why not hold elections every 3 months or every 5? etc etc etc.

Anything short of starting from scratch is not carrying out the R word.

The only thing that we should decide if we carry out the R word is that the first order of business for the new convention would be to elect a speaker to preside over the debate.
Logged
Teddy (IDS Legislator)
nickjbor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,200
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -1.91

WWW
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2010, 02:28:33 PM »

Atlasians,

I STRONGLY OPPOSE the Third Constitution in its current form, with the inclusion of a legislative re-boot:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I am a little bit miffed at Purple State for trying to sneak this in without any fanfare.  I actually missed this on my first reading.  We are about to throw six years of legislative history right out the window.  Everything our government has ever done, gone, done, erased.  Every bill that anyone at all has ever fought to get passed, we now have to do it again.  This is just fundamentally wrong, plain and simple.

I urge the Convention to remove this clause.  If it does not, I urge the public to vote the new Constitution down.

I didn't see this either. A Con Con and a R word (Reset, Reboot, Refresh, Restart) are different things and should be approached at different times. Without this single clause the Con Con may well pass unanimously, with it, the entire document will fail.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 10 queries.