Southeastern Voting Booth: Constitutional Amendments (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 07:35:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Voting Booth (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Southeastern Voting Booth: Constitutional Amendments (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Southeastern Voting Booth: Constitutional Amendments  (Read 3901 times)
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

« on: August 29, 2006, 03:16:40 PM »

5. Aye
6. Nay
7. Aye
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2006, 03:18:54 PM »

Quick, someone here carefully explain to me in your own words what Amendment 6 does.

Then explain why you voted Nay, other than to hop on the bandwagon.

I see no real need to vote for the amendment.  It makes things easier for the SoFA, I imagine, and it only takes a few minutes to include what state you are from in your signature.
Logged
ian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,461


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -1.39

« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2006, 06:02:05 PM »

I see no real need to vote for the amendment.

I see no reason to vote against it!

It makes things easier for the SoFA

What the amendment sought to fix has nothing to do with the SoFA's job.

it only takes a few minutes to include what state you are from in your signature.

So if I change my avatar to another state and don't put South Carolina in my signature, I shouldn't be serving as President because I'm violating the Constitution.

No.  We removed the part of the Constitution that made all voters have to go by this requirement because it was invalidating people's votes for a silly reason last year.  But I guess when it comes to doing the same thing for office holders, groupthink mentality matters more.

1. That's a really nasty tone that you take there.
2. I can only speak for myself, but I didn't even see how other people voted before I voted.
3. I, again, can't speak for everyone, but I answered your question about how I felt about the amendment.  I am sorry if I offended you with my ignorance about the game (SoFA), but I don't have the time to look over everything that has ever passed in Atlasia.
4. If anyone on the forum doesn't have room to speak about groupthink, it's you, Ebowed.  It astounds me that because you have such a high status in Atlasia, no one has critisized you for becoming a staunch libertarian in a matter of only a few months.

Don't get rude with me, and I won't get rude with you.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.