AZ-08 special election: Primary 4/17, General 6/12 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 05:21:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  AZ-08 special election: Primary 4/17, General 6/12 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AZ-08 special election: Primary 4/17, General 6/12  (Read 18468 times)
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,604
United States
« on: June 12, 2012, 10:16:11 PM »

http://www.pima.gov/elections/results1.htm
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,604
United States
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2012, 10:43:55 AM »
« Edited: June 13, 2012, 10:45:31 AM by xavier110 »

No pollster can exactly nail down margins, especially when there are undecideds in the poll and a margin of error. At this point, it's just nitpicking to claim PPP was wrong.

PPP actually showed Suzanne Bonamici up 52-41 in OR-1 before the election, she ending up winning 54-40, which was a case of PPP slightly overstating a Republican. It's polling, it doesn't always nail down margins exactly. Anyway, Kelly still lost, so it's all a moot point.


And yet when WAA did exactly the same thing as PPP just did (Walker +12), it was a little more than nitpicking.

It's very funny how you spinsters dance.

Releasing an outlier poll (+12 when everyone else was around +3-6) for a well-polled statewide race is entirely different from being the only friggin' outlet to release a poll for a congressional race.
Logged
xavier110
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,604
United States
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2012, 12:11:52 PM »

No pollster can exactly nail down margins, especially when there are undecideds in the poll and a margin of error. At this point, it's just nitpicking to claim PPP was wrong.

PPP actually showed Suzanne Bonamici up 52-41 in OR-1 before the election, she ending up winning 54-40, which was a case of PPP slightly overstating a Republican. It's polling, it doesn't always nail down margins exactly. Anyway, Kelly still lost, so it's all a moot point.


And yet when WAA did exactly the same thing as PPP just did (Walker +12), it was a little more than nitpicking.

It's very funny how you spinsters dance.

Releasing an outlier poll (+12 when everyone else was around +3-6) for a well-polled statewide race is entirely different from being the only friggin' outlet to release a poll for a congressional race.

Everyone? Actually nobody except 1 was below +5. Guess who that 1 was?



PPP (D)   6/2 - 6/3   1226 LV   50   47   Walker +3
Marquette University   5/23 - 5/26   600 LV   52   45   Walker +7
WPR/St. Norbert   5/17 - 5/22   406 LV   50   45   Walker +5
Daily Kos/PPP (D)   5/11 - 5/13   LV   50   45   Walker +5
Marquette University   5/9 - 5/12   600 LV   50   44   Walker +6
Rasmussen Reports   5/9 - 5/9   500 LV   50   45   Walker +5

To prove my point, I have deleted WAA polls from this list. Last time I checked, +12 is further away from the consensus spread than +3. Keep trying!!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.