Could a weaker central government work in the US today? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 03:29:20 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Could a weaker central government work in the US today? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Could a weaker central government work in the US today?  (Read 242 times)
Obama24
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 641
United States
« on: April 29, 2024, 08:52:43 AM »

As I get older, my thoughts tend to a sort of leftist, federalist, libertarianism.

To wit, I support universal healthcare, I support pot being legalized and I support trans people having healthcare rights and access (basically I don't care what someone does to their body or puts in it or who they sleep with - it's not my business).

What I do feel however is that our Congress really doesn't represent their constituents anymore; I feel the executive branch is bloated and the President is a bit too powerful; and the idea that 9 people in Washington make decisions that effect the lives of 300+ million seems a bit dystopian to me, especially after Dobbs.

I feel local and state governments do a better job of protecting the interests of their respective peoples more than a bloated bureaucracy in Washington do, yet I am torn.

Is there a way to decentralize power from Washington, while retaining things like Medicare, roads, national parks, etc? Even just a little?
Logged
Obama24
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 641
United States
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2024, 04:55:19 AM »

i think what obama24 is getting at is actually more or less the green party platform. its basically understanding that we need broad public ownership/"nationalization" of things like healthcare, energy, transportation infrastructure, etc. but also that centralization is not really democratic or responsive to the people. the ideal would be something like howie hawkins' plan for a national health service that is both universal (i.e. everyone is covered in a publicly owned program that eliminates private/corporate healthcare) while still being under local community control rather than some unaccountable federal bureaucracy. the same structure is basically replicated in the green party's ecosocialist green new deal and most of its platform/policy proposals

Something like this, yes. Basically it would be cool if each state was like its own little nation, except in the areas you mention - a high degree of autonomy except in areas that promote the general welfare such as healthcare, energy, transportation, roads, mail, etc.

Environmental policy for instance should be left up to the states, but with some kind of grant system or drawn from a common national fund for said policy. EG, I live in a coastal area. If my state decided to build sea walls, they could. They could fund it themselves, but if that funding proved too costly for the local taxpayer, than they could apply for a grant or fund (which would eventually be paid back) from the federal government.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.