Clarke is a political animal whose best friend is the senior foreign policy advisor to Kerry. That says it all. His statements to the committee directly contradict the statements he made in August 2002. You will have to write DOJ to ask about any prosecution. I heard Clarke's voice on the tape recording of the August 2002 background briefing. How is a recording of Clarke speaking spin? It is a recording that has been ignored by every network but Fox. Ignored, like it didn't exist.
O'Reilly is not a joke, its your opinion.
I meant ABS (bullsh**t) and NBS (bullsh**t).
Give me a break with your FOX News rip. They are different than CNN, CBS, NBS and ABS but that doesn't make them GOP news. They report both sides, did you ever watch a Fox News debate show? Watch Hannity and Colmes (a flaming liberal) and then turn to Larry King Live. King pitches soft balls.
Look at Clarke. A booking on O'Reilly is known to sell books, but Clarke did not book on O'Reilly. Why? Cause his ridiculous assertions and his lies would be ripped to shreds piece by piece. The mainstream media actually refuses to report the facts concerning Clarke and his contradicting statements. They ignore facts if those facts get in the way of their story. They have conviniently ignored Clarkes background interview he gave in 2002. They act like it doesn't exist.
Say this or that about Fox News, but they report both sides of an issue.
I see you have been watching TOO much Fox News.
Okay,
A. If Clarke is lieing, why don't they prosecute him for lieing under oath? They did it for Martha.
B. The Background check thing was a SPIN. If you are part of an admin, of course you are going to SPIN the negative and highlight the POSITIVE.
C. O'Reily is a JOKE.
D. CNN and MSNBC do present both of the sides and may lean towards a liberal audience BUT for the love of me, they do not make it as OBVIOUS as Fox NEWS. Just call it REPUBLICAN/PRO-BUSH/ NEWS.
