What would happen if a pro-choicer made the GOP ticket?

[President Mitt]

except morally I'm pro-choice

Contradiction.

Okay morally is wrong choice of word, should've gone with "personally" so I wouldn't offend the uber prolifer no compromise whatsoever on the issues people over this issue.
I'm sorry but I just find your position on this issue so bullheaded, especially for a libertarian, and note that I did not use quotation marks like I used to. Are you aware that a majority of libertarian leaners are more pro-choice than they are "pro-life"? If you are going to take such a die hard position the only people who probably would be eye to eye with you are the religious right wing of the Republican Party and if you are hoping for them to see sanity I got two words for ya: Good Luck.

True libertarians believe in the individual right to life. They are who see eye to eye with me.

Not really, most Libertarians I know, myself included, think that it's a decision that should be made between the Woman and her Doctor, not the Woman, her Doctor, and the Government.

[President Mitt]

While I don't agree the Libertarian Party is a good model for 'Libertarianism', I do agree that a central point of Libertarianism is Self-Ownership being the highest priority. I, and probably most Libertarians on this board and in public are probably pro-choice even if they are pro life in private.

And honestly, as a Male, I feel absolutely no right to regulate a Woman's privacy even if I wasn't pro-choice.