If Pennsylvania had full VBM in 2016, would Hillary have done better there than Wisconsin? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:19:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Dereich)
  If Pennsylvania had full VBM in 2016, would Hillary have done better there than Wisconsin? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Pennsylvania had full VBM in 2016, would Hillary have done better there than Wisconsin?  (Read 2713 times)
JohnAMacdonald
Rookie
**
Posts: 15
Canada
« on: March 02, 2024, 10:10:03 PM »
Quote from: MARGINS6729 on January 10, 2024, 04:06:19 AM
No, she didn't. She lost PA by 44,292 while she lost Wisconsin by 22,748. I go by the raw votes, not the percentages.

By that logic, Donald trump did better in DC (lost by 270 107 votes) than New Jersey ( lost by 546 345 votes)
Logged
JohnAMacdonald
Rookie
**
Posts: 15
Canada
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2024, 05:31:25 PM »

No, it isn't.
[/quote]

Yes it is. Clinton lost Georgia by 211,141 votes, while she lost Wyoming by 118,446 votes.

Would you really say that Hillary Clinton did better in Wyoming than in Georgia?
[/quote]

When it comes to states with different sized populations, that's different.
[/quote]

So Pennsylvania (13.0 million people) has the same population as Wisconsin (5.9 million people)? Well, sounds like someone flunked math class...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.