SCOTUS: In dissent, Thomas calls for Batson to be overruled! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 02:45:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  SCOTUS: In dissent, Thomas calls for Batson to be overruled! (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SCOTUS: In dissent, Thomas calls for Batson to be overruled!  (Read 1036 times)
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


« on: June 26, 2019, 01:04:44 PM »

If flowers is overruled and wrote was overruled, does that mean defense attorneys will start preempting people in abortion trials for being even Fundagelical, Mormon, Or Catholic? Basically, you could turn the entire system into catch and release based on being able to reliably game the voir dire process.
Yes. If if the Establishment Clause is gutted. Thomas thinks the Establishment Clause (and probably the Free Exercise Clause) doesn’t apply to the states.

Thomas has repeatedly supported the application of Free Exercise to states and localities (ex. Hialeah, Locke v. Davey, Masterpiece Cakeshop)
Thomas’ Masterpiece Cakeshop opinion mentions free exercise, but his opinion is more about suggesting the 1964 Civil Rights Act is unconstitutional.

Clarence Thomas, no filter:

http://www.morethings.com/fan/boondocks/boondocks-mlk-2006-1230.jpg
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.