SENATE BILL: 5th Amendment to the Proportional Representation Act (law'd)

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Nay

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

In this world where I am elected President, I assume Cincinnatus would take over if I died.

That is why we have a Vice President, no?

You know the difference between presidential/vice presidential and senatorial elections, don't you?

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Anyway, partisan appointments are against Democracy. Period.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Or was your point that tmth conceded his seat, and that the Officepark appointment was illegal?

Tmthforu was elected for Mideast regional seat, declined and Governor appointed his (and tmth's) party colleague. Because law does not provide special election on regional level, then I can't see any legal problem (what else, leave seat vacant for entire term? )

The same situation with Snowguy. When I was elected to the Vice Presidency and Senate, I had to decline my seat, so Governor (Sewer) appointed Snowguy. We all happen to be JCP-ers.

Anyway, I oppose appointments and I don't want this crap to extend on at-large level. Period.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Look at the law I cited. It says the runner-up becomes Senator.

You'd have huge problem to enforce it in Midwest, when I were elected anb then declined, since only runner-up, Svensson, already left for another region.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I'm going to oppose any party selections/appointments for vacant at-large seats. Period.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

That's kind of a vague post. Neither of the amendments actually changes whether or not the party appoints the replacement, so I would assume you're not objecting... However, I'll wait for you to clarify just to be certain.

Both of the amendments have passed as friendly, then.

Not objecting

Still, bill is piece of crap.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Nay

We need to get rid off all appointments.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

VETO

YES!