Canada Expels Indian diplomat after accusing India of killing their citizen on Canadian Soil (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 12:01:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Canada Expels Indian diplomat after accusing India of killing their citizen on Canadian Soil (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Canada Expels Indian diplomat after accusing India of killing their citizen on Canadian Soil  (Read 6095 times)
Open Source Intelligence
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 992
United States
« on: May 06, 2024, 09:14:55 AM »
« edited: May 06, 2024, 09:27:59 AM by Open Source Intelligence »

The killing of Nijjar was caused at least in part by Trudeau's own policies - the fact that he had the audacity to cause an international diplomatic dispute over it for his own political benefit shows his reckless, narcissistic and vacuous approach to international relations.

Yes, Trudeau should have hushed up the murder of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil to avoid hurting the feelings of those responsible. Roll Eyes

Maybe the cause of the diplomatic dispute was the murder itself, not the fuss it caused?

Foreign affairs operates under its own rules. He should've never brought it up publicly unless his allies were willing to back him up on it publicly, and they didn't. His only other step is just to produce all the facts in a seating of Parliament, he didn't do that either.
Logged
Open Source Intelligence
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 992
United States
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2024, 10:20:47 AM »

Firstly, the facts as they currently are don't exactly portray Trudeau in a positive light. Lax border security makes it very easy for nefarious actors to commit acts like this. Lax border security seems to have been a factor here, because the alleged killers of Nijjar entered the country on student visas. If Trudeau were seriously concerned about foreign actors killing our citizens, we would have much stricter border security and a foreign agent registry by now, yet we don't have these things. Trudeau is abdicating his own responsibility to defend our national security, which makes me roll my eyes when he expresses indignation toward the Indian government regarding the killing.
It appears the Indian government paid the "students" after they had arrived in Canada. These types of assassinations also happen in many countries with famously tight security. If not through "students", the hit could have been conducted in any other way. So, while border security could be tighter, I'm not sure that blaming this on immigration policy is quite accurate.

It's also very suspicious that the Conservatives were reluctant to expand the scope of the inquiry into foreign interference to cover all actions by all foreign powers. Could it be connected to CSIS investigating Indian interference in the Conservative campaign in last year's Oxford by-election? I guess that explains Pierre Poilevre's BS-ing on this matter: he refuses to obtain a security clearance to review top-secret intelligence, because he would rather continue BS-ing than know the full facts.

Quote
Secondly, publicly accusing a state of killing your citizen is not a decision to be made lightly. It's better to know you will have backing from other allies as well as to make sure you have somewhat complete information. There's still a lot we don't know about the level at which the Indian government was involved - was it just a rogue intel agent, or was it ordered at the executive level? If it was the former, for all we know, Ottawa could have informed the Indian government privately and they might have dealt with the rogue individual. The US could also have privately intervened to side with Canada. If Trudeau planned to go public about the allegation, how it is revealed could have been co-ordinated with the US and other allies. He lost a lot of leverage by trying to be self-righteous and recklessly revealing the allegation on his own. Early in the dispute, the US seemed to side with Canada but didn't want to discuss it publicly, making the whole thing harder to solve. The reckless manner in which the allegation was revealed also made Canada susceptible to propaganda from Indian media, which also didn't help the situation.

Trudeau could have handled the whole thing far more prudently.

The PMO wanted to keep the story quiet, until Robert Fife approached it for comment. After that, it became impossible to cover up the story. It's the cost of freedom of press.

"The government refrains from commenting on ongoing criminal investigations." Obviously it was an ongoing criminal investigation, because they're just now making arrests. The Trudeau government has hardly had trouble during its time in power not telling the press anything, it's not like they have some grand commitment to transparency to where "we have to be open in public on this".

These guys were pretty dumb to stick around in Canada in my opinion.
Logged
Open Source Intelligence
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 992
United States
« Reply #2 on: May 07, 2024, 10:00:46 AM »

Imagine if we judged everyone by the actions the committed when they were 15...

Social media bud, new world. Nothing you do is private.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.