No. At least not until the next century, and hopefully not in my lifetime at the soonest.
Hopefully? Don't want a gay President then?
I'll be laughing my ass off when we have a gay president in 2052, you faghater.
Hey, I do not hate anyone whose sexual orientation is different from the norm. However, on religious and moral grounds, I cannot support their movement for Gay Marriage (which I hold as a religious institution, not general), though I have no problem with Civil Unions. That does not mean that I support their lifestyle, but they should be allowed to do so. A LGBT President would likely push for the exact reform to which I am opposed. Again, it is not a problem of qualification, but one of policy.
