SB 2016-110: Police Responsibility Act (Debating) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 12:50:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 2016-110: Police Responsibility Act (Debating) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 2016-110: Police Responsibility Act (Debating)  (Read 2686 times)
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


« on: July 07, 2017, 11:57:50 AM »
« edited: July 07, 2017, 09:56:34 PM by Barnes »

I respectfully propose the following amendment:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This amendment seeks to establish federal funding for an ombudsman services to work with regional and local police services in an effort to root out internal failures of policy and practices. Furthermore, the services shall be explicitly required to investigate the general work place condition and culture of the local services.

In my opinion, an issue of paramount concern is to root out internal corruption and practices and to return a feeling of trust and mutual respect between police forces and the local communities which they are pledged to serve and protect.
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2017, 09:55:56 PM »

The business of the nation never stops! But, of course, you are correct and my intention was merely to have this ready for when the Senate can resume its normal activities.

I have had a word with my staff using iPhones to draft amendments.
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2017, 04:41:08 PM »

Again, thanks to Senator Scott for accepting my proposal. I would like to see more definition and clarity given to Section Two's use of "police brutality" in order to not institute a bureaucratic and legal minefield and to ensure that departments cannot weave their way around responsibility by denying the applicability of the term in their circumstances.
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2017, 06:31:29 PM »

I think providing clarity to the definition will strengthen the provisions of the bill, and I support the amendment.
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


« Reply #4 on: August 01, 2017, 11:58:28 AM »

I think we've made a good piece of legislation here, so, unless there are any objections, I move:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Barnes
Roy Barnes 2010
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,556


« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2017, 07:24:28 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.