May I ask why the Northeast Community Health Partnership is third in overall funding even though it is second in population size, nearly tied with the Mideast, and larger than the other three regions by nearly ten voters each?
Probably relates to the actual population of the regions. It makes sense that then the Midwest has the lowest population=lowest funding sum; Pacific and Northeast with one big state/two states of about the same size (Califorina vs Penn and NY) the next highest; and so on and so on.
It would be interesting though to take 2014 Census Estimates for that, I'm sure the Pacific would get more then
Are you saying the allocations are based off of the US population estimates?
My concern is that in Atlasia, the Northeast has the second largest population, but comes in third with funding.