Vatican City 2013 papal election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 05:06:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Vatican City 2013 papal election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Vatican City 2013 papal election  (Read 54755 times)
doktorb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,072
United Kingdom


WWW
« on: February 11, 2013, 06:56:32 AM »

From another place:

"It is worth noting that England and Wales will not have a vote to select the new pope. Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor is now 80 years old and ineligible to take part in the conclave. His successor, Archbishop Vincent Nichols, has not yet received his promotion to cardinal. Cardinal Keith O'Brien of Scotland will be able to take part."
Logged
doktorb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,072
United Kingdom


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2013, 12:51:16 AM »

Every name suggested here is followed by the sentence "...is currently regarded as the favourite to succeed Pope Benedict....." when Googled Smiley
Logged
doktorb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,072
United Kingdom


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2013, 01:04:07 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

One reason being, he is too young. The experience of John Paul II should be sobering: only 3 of the cardinals in the Conclave that elected him where still eligible to vote the next time around. And one of these three (Jaime Cardinal Sin of Manila) was so infirm he never made it to Rome, which left just two to actually  participate. Granted, one of the two got to be elected Pope (the other was the American, William Cardinal Baum). But that was luck. For most of them it should be clear: you elect the young guy now, you won't be the Pope yourself.

Which is sobering a thought for them but not perhaps great practice in the long term. Stability, which is what the Church really needs right now, is not best given by way of four and twenty 80-year-olds being bumped off every five years in the name of ambition (or something like ambition).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.