Reality check:
http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/secure/newsletter/articles/sanger-hitler_equation.html
More to the point, the pro-choice movement, both today and even historically, goes FAR beyond Margaret Sanger. I would be surprised if more than a small minority of staunchly pro-choice voters even knew who she was.
Applying racism, let alone premeditated genocide, as even the tiniest motive for opposing laws that would imprison women and doctors for terminating even first trimester pregnancies is grossly fantastic and insulting.
Shame on the forum posters here who actually are drinking this kool-aid. Without disrespect to your views--which I shared in my youth--most of you are smart enough to know better. You can be staunchly pro-life and not buy this unmitigated garbage.
Okay I'll speak up.
As someone who is pro-life the idea that Planned Parenthood is actively committing genocide is insulting to my intelligence. I believe that life is being terminated, however I don't believe the organization is roaming the streets of poor areas with shotguns demanding that all pregnant blacks go to the clinic and get their kids aborted. That is just insane.
I mean if we are going to argue semantics here with a word like "genocide" let's at least do so honestly. If there is something like sterilizer in water preventing reproduction then yes the argument of genocide could possibly be made, however this is about women going to clinics without being forced by Planned Parenthood to abort their children. No guns are pointed at their head forcing them to do so (at least that I know of).
Wow, this is going to sound really bad to all sides.
