Yes, this has been clear for at least a few months now. The fascists are taking over, first in November and then in 2012 when they will cement their control.
Since when is less restrictions fascist?
The majority of them only support "less restrictions" in economic policy. In social policy and foreign policy....well....
And the "less restrictions" they support in economic policy just means enriching the already rich and impoverishing the rest of us.
There are libertarian ones. They are less fascist than even a moderate.
As for economics, I'm pretty sure being against bailing out big companies is very right-wing. It's the Dems that want their buddies to be fat and happy.
Both parties supported the bailout (as they should have, because it saved the world economy). But the Democrats at least want low-to-moderate taxes on the rich; the Republicans want as little as possible. In that regard, I'd argue it's the GOP that wants their buddies (the ones spending millions in independent expenditures on behalf of their candidates this cycle) to be fat and happy.
Tea Partiers did NOT support the bailout.
Yes, there are libertarian tea-partiers. How is that confusing?
Lief has become one of the most hackish posters here (not that he ever wasn't). In fact, the way he talks, he's almost like a left-wing Libertas.
