Bow Chicka Bow Wow Bill (Debating) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 04:14:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Bow Chicka Bow Wow Bill (Debating) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bow Chicka Bow Wow Bill (Debating)  (Read 29619 times)
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
« on: October 01, 2009, 09:54:07 PM »
Regardless of your opinions, current laws are unenforceable.

@ MaxQue: Lowering the age wouldn't make it much less taboo as parents still would not be happy with their children viewing porn.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2009, 10:10:56 PM »
Quote from: Senator MaxQue on October 01, 2009, 10:00:17 PM
Quote from: Midwest Governor Vepres on October 01, 2009, 09:54:07 PM
Regardless of your opinions, current laws are unenforceable.

@ MaxQue: Lowering the age wouldn't make it much less taboo as parents still would not be happy with their children viewing porn.

Don't overgeneralize, Vepres. Some parents has no problems with that. My parents autorized me to look porn at 16 years old, since they jugded than I was mature enough.

True, though there are fewer parents like that in the US/Atlasia due to our puritan roots and such. But as I said, it's unenforceable. Hell, I started watching porn when I was 13  (my parents disapproved Tongue), though it's been months since I've watched it lately (last part irrelevant).
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2009, 03:58:45 PM »
Just because one is a hypocrite doesn't mean they don't have a valid point.

Anyway, there's no reason to oppose this bill as current laws are unenforceable.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2009, 09:04:07 PM »
Perhaps the government should fund therapy groups for porn addicts. Maybe even have some designed for minors. Just a thought.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2009, 12:42:50 PM »
Quote from: Senator Marokai Blue on October 03, 2009, 09:18:47 PM
I don't really think such a thing is necessary. Besides, it's not like there aren't support groups out there for that type of thing already, why would they need additional funding?

It also implies that this bill will suddenly create a significantly higher proportion of pornography addicts, which is quite frankly, retarded.

I did not intend to imply that, but if the Senate supports the idea, might as well have them in the same bill.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
« Reply #5 on: October 06, 2009, 06:08:56 PM »
Porn affects everybody differently. Yes, some will become addicted or even motivated to commit sexual assault, on the other hand, Earl does make a good case.

Either way, the law isn't enforceable, so you might as well remove the age limit all together.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2009, 09:56:00 PM »

Jeez Fritz, I didn't know you were a southern-style theocrat Wink
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2009, 09:25:46 AM »
Quote from: Senator Fritz on October 11, 2009, 09:23:34 AM
My vote has nothing whatsoever to do with theocracy, morality, etc.  If you read my posts in this thread you would know that.

I was joking.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 8 queries.