Federal Marriage Amendment

[Brambila]

Legistlate morality? Huh? That's what the government does, dudes. If the government didn't legistlate morality, pedophilia, poligamy, murder, harassment, all of these things would happen. Seeing that homosexual marriage is extremely detrimental to society, I see no reason in NOT having a FMA. They can do very well with civil unions.

[Brambila]

What needs to be understood is what marriage is. Marriage, in it's definition, is the UNION between a MAN and a WOMAN. NO SAME SEX IS INCLUDED IN THIS DEFINITION.

[Brambila]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's never what it's meant though. Recognized marriage between different races has always existed. Nobody doubts when two people of different races marry, that they truly have a marriage. It's just trivializing history by comparing the two. The problem is, GLBTs are trying to change the definition of marriage completely.

It was never a definition that marriage was the union between two people of the same race.

[Brambila]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Because it's the definition that societies for thousands of years were built on. Marriage has ALWAYS represented the future generations, NOT sexual pleasure.

[Brambila]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Of course not. But the intention still remains. It's still POSSIBLE for those two people to have children. It's still following the definition of between a man and woman.  But homosexuals, it's completely out of the question- it's impossible for two people of the same sex to produce one child.

[Brambila]

That's not my point. My point is it's a historical trivialization to compare marrying the same people to marrying people of two different races- after all, race doesn't exist; sex does. With two different races, you're still following the evolutionary code and marrying for the possible later production of children. Same-sex marriage doesn't do this.

[Brambila]

Nym90, that doesn't matter. Their sexual intercourse is still natural. Homosexual intercourse is not. I mean, it's the wrong piping, if you know what I mean. The anus was made for one reason, and the mouth has several reasons besides... that.

[Brambila]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Brambila]

I'm not saying we should. Neither do I believe that homosexual sex should be banned. I'm just saying that it's immoral.

[Brambila]

If it were illegalized? That's not what I want. I'm saying it's immoral. I don't think sodomy should be illegal, though if it were illegal (along with oral and anal sex) AIDS would greatly decrease in the US.

[Brambila]

it's extremely unnatural and missing the entire point. If it's unnatural, it is therefore immoral.

However, I'm not going to illegalize it. What two adults do in the bedroom is fine.

[Brambila]

Actually, natural law was redefined by Darwin in the 19th century. Natural Law is not a religious belief, it's a requirement for the evolutionary survival of humanity.

I can picture you a hundred years from now murdering a 3-year-old boy, and when I criticize you, you'll say "Morality? Humanity got over that centuries ago..."

[Brambila]

In addition to Natural Selection, Darwin had Natural Law.