At least when you troll, you stick to one-liners. James is trying to make his trolling sound like legitimate debate by using lots of words.
Lots of words? There are barely over a hundred there. It is unfortunate if you consider that to be a lot of words. I suppose you're eyes must have glossed over at the detailed posts of Beet and pragmatic liberal. But hey - I'm just following the good old appeal to ridicule which you so skillessly wield (helped only by the tendency for the human brain to shut down in response to mockery.
Hey, I recognize that this is just a playground. No actual policy is decided here, so it isn't world changing if you cling to old stereotypes rather than take a look around and recognize how many assumptions there are out there in the real world that go unchallenged.
If you feel like it - perhaps on a break from your trollish duties - take a good look around you and try observing the world without prejudice - you might just be surprised at what you find (if you can find the courage to think - a false certainty in a specific worldview can a lot more comforting than embracing the doubt that comes with recognizing that we don't know it all and that our information is always imperfect. But I doubt you even read this far - too many words, I suppose.
James, the moment you claimed that Democrats are "largely for free markets", it became obvious that you were either a troll or seriously misinformed.