Australian Federal Election 2004 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 12:20:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Australian Federal Election 2004 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Australian Federal Election 2004  (Read 9831 times)
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,501
Belgium


« on: April 19, 2004, 09:03:20 AM »
« edited: April 19, 2004, 09:05:05 AM by Umengus »

I wish the victory of the left and the failure of Howard (after Aznar and before Berlusconi, Bush and Blair), the poodle of Bush.
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,501
Belgium


« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2004, 05:55:14 AM »
« Edited: May 17, 2004, 05:56:08 AM by Umengus »

"Howard unfazed by talk of election loss

But with his big-spending budget falling flat with Aussie voters,the PM is unlikely to call early polls

SYDNEY - Prime Minister John Howard has dismissed an opinion poll showing his government faces election defeat this year after a big-spending budget failed to win over voters.

He said yesterday the poll was meaningless because it had been taken too soon after Tuesday's budget, which contained more than A$30 billion (S$36 billion) in election sweeteners in the form of tax cuts and handouts to families.

Advertisement
 
'I think it takes a while for these things to have an influence,' he said in a TV interview.

'It's a gradual process. People don't suddenly change even when they receive benefits.'

Mr Howard, whose Liberal government is facing an unexpectedly strong challenge from rookie opposition Labor Party leader Mark Latham, has repeatedly warned his party faithful against complacency in the bid for a fourth term at an election due anytime between August and December.

The poll published in the Sun-Herald newspaper found the government's standing in the electorate had fallen after the budget, which represented a central plank of the Liberals' re-election strategy.

The telephone poll of 911 voters put the ruling Liberal-National coalition's primary vote at 40 per cent, trailing the main opposition Labor Party's 44 per cent.

It found 14 per cent of voters would switch to Labor because of the budget, while only 8 per cent would shift to voting for the government.

Analysts had expected Mr Howard to call an early August general election but if the budget has fallen flat among the swinging voters, he is likely to wait until October or November to try to chip away at Mr Latham's credibility.

Further surveys are expected to provide an accurate gauge of public opinion this week and will be intensely studied by government election strategists.

Mr Latham said the poll reflected public cynicism at the budget spending spree, which targeted middle- to high-income earners and gave nothing to the most needy.

'There are a lot of people who have got every reason to be disappointed with the budget on Tuesday, the four out of five taxpayers who missed out, the large number of families and singles who didn't receive any form of relief,' he told reporters.

Meanwhile, Mr Howard said he would not retire if his party won the election, saying he would have to get run over by a bus for his heir-apparent to get the top job, the Sunday Telegraph reported.

Finance Minister Peter Costello has hinted that he is reconsidering his political future.

He has been treasurer for eight years and his long-term hope that Mr Howard would eventually step aside and give him the premiership seems continually thwarted.

Mr Howard said Mr Costello might replace him 'if and when I went under a bus'. -- Reuters, AP, AFP"


Source: http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/world/story/0,4386,251350,00.html
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,501
Belgium


« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2004, 02:52:31 AM »

Wich governments in Europe? france? Belgium? please, be not stupid...to be against Sharon and his policy is not to be against Israel. It is the opposite: The policy of Sharon is not good for Israel.
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,501
Belgium


« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2004, 04:02:45 AM »
« Edited: May 29, 2004, 04:05:12 AM by Umengus »

M, it was *some* Belgians who wanted to put Sharon on trial, not Belgium

exactly. and the law changed and justice said that Sharon (and Arafat because some people wanted this guy on trial too) could not be on trial in Belgium.

Lots of people in Europe (and in USA I think) think that the policy of Sharon is a obstacle for the peace in the worl and it's the case.

The position of France is clear: "road map" for this moment and why not "geneve agreement" after... Security for Israel and the end of occupation in PAlestine.

The policy of Bush, specially in Middle east, is catastrophic and if I was jew in USA, i would vote for Kerry: democrats are better for this.

It's true to say that there is a growth of antisemistic in France and in Belgium. But it's due to muslim minority in these countries. I (and another Belgians and French) don't like muslims and turkish minorities or maroccan minorities or... Please don't confond!
Logged
Umengus
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,501
Belgium


« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2004, 07:22:34 AM »

-A french EU MP doesn't represent France.

-policy of appeasement was a very great mistake, it's clear but I don't understand your comparaison. Situation is very different.

-During WW2, Belgian authorities were in London. Difficult to kill jews in London... Belgium was not free and authorities were not legitimate by a popular vote. After the war, collaboration were punished very hard.

-I don't know if dems have a good  track about this problem but it's clear that Bush is very bad on this topic. Look at the currently situation.

-The Geneva plan is for me the good solution. I know, he is not legitimate for this moment but if left will can take the power by elections, The Geneva plan will can maybe a reality. I hope that. There is not another solution for this conflict.

-Road map asks stop colonization too . I don't see that. does Arafat support terrorism? maybe but I think that his power is today very weak. Terrorism is stronger than Arafat. How Arafat can stop terrorism if the policy of Sharon is to kill his organisation, his structure, his men,...? I can't understand...

-Don't forget that when sharon deletes settlements in Gaza, he confirms settlements in cisjordanie, on a palestian territory. Not a peace factor.

The best for the future is a victory of left in israelian elections and the application of Geneva plan. I can dream...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.