You have to hand it to them — these guys are trying really hard in the "worst pollster of the cycle" competition, which is admittedly tougher this cycle than it ever has been.
We need more Democratic junk polls like this to counter the narrative coming from the absolute wave of Republican junk polls this cycle so I salute what they're doing.
There is no "absolute wave of Republican junk polls this cycle," this is ridiculous.
I'm impressed by the level of shameless and ignorant assertions Democrats have made about Republican bias this cycle. To actually cry about 'waves of Republican Junk Polls' in a thread discussing a fraudulent poll that Democrats released.
It is absolutely ridiculous, especially considering Cygnal actually seems to be one of the more reasonable pollsters (alongside its Democratic counterpart, Data for Progress).
They're going to look a lot like the 2012 Romney unskewers in a couple weeks.
Didn't Karl Rove have a meltdown when Fox News projected Ohio for Obama in 2012? Many Democrats seem to have this Rove kind of mentality, and might still be in denial on Election Day, even as the results come in.
I remember those days, and Republicans at the time were trying to unskew extremely unbiased, mainstream polling from the major firms of the day. Said firms fell through the floor after 2016, and what we've largely been left with is a soul-sucking void of absolutely Lovecraftian crosstabs and blatant partisan bias. You practically
have to unskew until one of the major polling outfits finally emerges, blinking in terror, from its cave.
