2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 08:24:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2022 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread  (Read 173712 times)
Dani Rose
danixander92
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 795
United States


« on: October 27, 2022, 12:14:11 PM »

I'm beginning to suspect that the GOP surge last week might have been certain pollsters overreacting to a relatively lackluster week of early voting for us.
Logged
Dani Rose
danixander92
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 795
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2022, 11:50:37 AM »
« Edited: October 28, 2022, 11:54:06 AM by Danielle »

This GCB nonsense is not doing anything to challenge my belief that the lunatic ups and downs in polling this year are literally just the result of an unprecedented gaggle of terrible polling firms.

I just want one reputable company to put out polls. Just one, even one single time before the election. That's it. I don't care what the result is, I just want one set of numbers that aren't kooky-dukes one single time before E-Day.
Logged
Dani Rose
danixander92
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 795
United States


« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2022, 12:45:55 PM »

Even though I'm stubbornly wearing the armor of unstoppable optimism with regard to this election, I genuinely understand why people here are worried - about most of the country. But the dooming I'm seeing with regard to California and Washington is just silly. I highly doubt that the GOP's 2022 platform of "no regulation on the economy, all regulation in your pants" is what's going to finally break the dam for them in the West Coast.
Logged
Dani Rose
danixander92
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 795
United States


« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2022, 03:25:10 PM »



Literally just lighting money on fire. Yes, Brownley's district could be competitive, but the other two just straight-up aren't happening.
Logged
Dani Rose
danixander92
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 795
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2022, 01:14:46 PM »

Is Democrats internal polling varying wildly from public polling or something?



Running up the numbers, I think, plus what was said above me about using excess funding for whatever good it can still do. I imagine the wave of awful GOP-aligned polling has also given some incumbents at least a little pause for thought, as hugely unlikely as it is that they actually lose.
Logged
Dani Rose
danixander92
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 795
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2022, 09:11:17 PM »

Civiqs looks like it's gonna end up with D+3, 50-47

https://civiqs.com/results/vote_house_generic_2022_lv?uncertainty=true&annotations=true&zoomIn=true

They have:

18-34: D+20 (57-37)
35-49: D+6 (51-45)
50-64: R+8 (52-44)
65+: D+4 (51-47)

Females: D+18 (57-39)
Males: R+14 (55-41)
Independents: R+4 (48-44)

Whites: R+15 (56-41)
Blacks: D+80 (88-8)
Hispanic/Latino: D+27 (61-34)

My favorite gender.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 11 queries.