NV: Mason-Dixon: Tight race for Senate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 12:06:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2010 Elections
  2010 Senatorial Election Polls
  NV: Mason-Dixon: Tight race for Senate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NV: Mason-Dixon: Tight race for Senate  (Read 3077 times)
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00
« on: July 30, 2010, 10:39:18 AM »

Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2010, 11:04:11 AM »

Fake libertarian?  Lulz.

I prefer her over Reid, certainly.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2010, 11:34:09 AM »
Quote from: You were once a gentleman on July 30, 2010, 11:26:01 AM
Then you support alcohol prohibition and the promotion of Scientology's authoritarian agenda.

I do not.  Nor does Sharron Angle.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2010, 05:25:50 PM »
Don't these people realize that not voting is just going to get Reid elected?
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2010, 01:23:03 AM »
Anybody else notice that the margin between Reid and Angle's numbers is within both the Margin of Error and percentage of undecided voters?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.