How would the South Park characters vote in 2008? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 12:09:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  How would the South Park characters vote in 2008? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How would the South Park characters vote in 2008?  (Read 1969 times)
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,703
Ukraine


« on: November 25, 2007, 10:01:58 PM »

Cartman - Tancredo
Stan - Obama or Guiliani
Kyle - Obama
Kenny - Huckabee or Edwards

Butters - Romney?
Ms. Garrison - Tancredo (would have been Kucinich when she was a Mr.)
Big Gay Al - Kucinich or Hillary

since they're all from Tancredo's neck of the woods, he gets a bump

Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,703
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2007, 12:52:33 AM »

I would be willing to beat Trey Parker and Matt Stone have given money to Ron Paul, abortion seems to be their only difference:

"Abortion?, it goes well with a little red wine"
        -Trey Parker

Paul fails as a libertarian on abortion.

Trey Parker and Matt Stone fail as libertarians as well.  They are both hardcore conservatives.  I have never looked at South Park in the same way since the Big Gay Al as Boy Scout leader episode (and remember that I myself am an Eagle Scout!).
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,703
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2007, 11:32:07 PM »

I would be willing to beat Trey Parker and Matt Stone have given money to Ron Paul, abortion seems to be their only difference:

"Abortion?, it goes well with a little red wine"
        -Trey Parker

Paul fails as a libertarian on abortion.

Trey Parker and Matt Stone fail as libertarians as well.  They are both hardcore conservatives.  I have never looked at South Park in the same way since the Big Gay Al as Boy Scout leader episode (and remember that I myself am an Eagle Scout!).

"Hardcore Conservativs"? I don't think so Harry but I'm not sure if I saw the episode you're talking about.

The Scouts wouldn't let Big Gay Al stay in because he was gay. Which changed by the end of the episode but Harry probably got too mad at a cartoon because of it and didn't watch the end.

No, Big Gay Al was like "The Scouts should be able to discriminate"  The point of the episode was Matt and Trey approve of the Boy Scouts' gay bigotry.  If an actual libertarian made the show, they would have argued to the end that Al should have been let back in.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,703
Ukraine


« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2007, 06:19:10 PM »

I would be willing to beat Trey Parker and Matt Stone have given money to Ron Paul, abortion seems to be their only difference:

"Abortion?, it goes well with a little red wine"
        -Trey Parker

Paul fails as a libertarian on abortion.

Trey Parker and Matt Stone fail as libertarians as well.  They are both hardcore conservatives.  I have never looked at South Park in the same way since the Big Gay Al as Boy Scout leader episode (and remember that I myself am an Eagle Scout!).

"Hardcore Conservativs"? I don't think so Harry but I'm not sure if I saw the episode you're talking about.

The Scouts wouldn't let Big Gay Al stay in because he was gay. Which changed by the end of the episode but Harry probably got too mad at a cartoon because of it and didn't watch the end.

No, Big Gay Al was like "The Scouts should be able to discriminate"  The point of the episode was Matt and Trey approve of the Boy Scouts' gay bigotry.  If an actual libertarian made the show, they would have argued to the end that Al should have been let back in.

I believe the ultimate libertarian position would be that the government shouldn't be telling organizations whom to let and whom not to let in. 

Yep, that was pretty much the point. They weren't saying it was ok to discriminate, unlike what Harry thinks.

Yes, they were.  They were saying it should be allowed for the Scouts to have a hateful discriminatory policy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.