The Borders Act (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 11:17:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  The Borders Act (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Borders Act  (Read 1790 times)
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,656
Ukraine


« on: November 13, 2004, 01:33:19 PM »

Here's an idea to help redistricting and the NY bottleneck.  It'll also fix the fact that AK and HI dont border anything.

The Borders Act.
Section 1.  The following sets of states shall be considered "bordering" for the purpose of redistricting:  New York and Michigan; New Jersey and Connecticut; Alaska and Washington; Hawaii and California; Michigan and Minnesota.

If anyone has suggestions on other sets, or would like to see states taken out, please suggest.  I really think this would help solve some redistricting problems.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,656
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2004, 02:30:42 PM »

That would give some states double representation. that's a no-no.
how?  It just eases the redistricting process by "creating" borders between states.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,656
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2004, 03:54:19 PM »

Hmmm, we could split PA into two states, and do the same with NY.  East/west on PA and NYC/upstate for NY, and have everyone register in one or the other.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,656
Ukraine


« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2004, 08:00:26 PM »

Hmmm, we could split PA into two states, and do the same with NY.  East/west on PA and NYC/upstate for NY, and have everyone register in one or the other.

As I say, that is impractical because:
1. We would have to decide where the new borders would be.
2. Its a buggar for people already registered there to have work out which half they want.
3. What do we do with the people who inevitably don't bother to pick one half of the State to move into?
1. Not a problem.
2. Whichever side they live on.
3. We could call one "Pennsylvania" and the other "Allegheny" or something.  So people would at first be all registered in PA, and if they wanted could switch to Allegheny.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,656
Ukraine


« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2004, 08:06:13 PM »

On behalf of my constituents in PA and NY, I strongly oppose any attempt to split the states in two, for the reasons Attorney General Peter Bell has specified.  Not only will it be rather unruly, it would also make the registration process more complicated for those in these states than for those living in other states.  It is unfair to force these measures upon registered voters simply because of their geographic location.

well something needs to be done to make redistricting not only easier but also giving more options, and these are the only two ways I can think of doing it:  "creating" borders or splitting states
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.