FLASH: Stupak deal-in-the-making would put Pelosi over 216

[Badger]

These people should read the writing on the wall. There is no room for pro-life views in the Demoncrap party any more.

1.  The language in the Senate Bill already banned public funding on abortion.

2.  This bill was about healthcare, not about abortion.  Stupak wanted to change the abortion law in this country by trying to ban Private Insurers from covering abortion.  I'm sure some pro-life Democrats probably support banning Private Insurers from covering abortions, but realize this bill is not the time or place to try and change abortion law. 

Protecting the health of unborn children is still healthcare.

So you would support this measure, right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/95-10_Initiative

[Badger]

These people should read the writing on the wall. There is no room for pro-life views in the Demoncrap party any more.

1.  The language in the Senate Bill already banned public funding on abortion.

2.  This bill was about healthcare, not about abortion.  Stupak wanted to change the abortion law in this country by trying to ban Private Insurers from covering abortion.  I'm sure some pro-life Democrats probably support banning Private Insurers from covering abortions, but realize this bill is not the time or place to try and change abortion law. 

Protecting the health of unborn children is still healthcare.

So you would support this measure, right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/95-10_Initiative

Yes, I don't see why not. What's your point?

I assumed you would've instinctively opposed the various "socialist" measures designed to ensure pre-natal health such as fully funding WIC and extending SCHIP to all pregnant women. I'll admit you surprised me here.

[Badger]

These people should read the writing on the wall. There is no room for pro-life views in the Demoncrap party any more.

1.  The language in the Senate Bill already banned public funding on abortion.

2.  This bill was about healthcare, not about abortion.  Stupak wanted to change the abortion law in this country by trying to ban Private Insurers from covering abortion.  I'm sure some pro-life Democrats probably support banning Private Insurers from covering abortions, but realize this bill is not the time or place to try and change abortion law. 

Protecting the health of unborn children is still healthcare.

So you would support this measure, right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/95-10_Initiative

Yes, I don't see why not. What's your point?

I assumed you would've instinctively opposed the various "socialist" measures designed to ensure pre-natal health such as fully funding WIC and extending SCHIP to all pregnant women. I'll admit you surprised me here.

The costs of that would be a pittance compared to the lives that could be saved. There is plenty of other spending that could be cut to pay for it.

Kudos.