Washington state megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 10:41:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Washington state megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Washington state megathread  (Read 860614 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,288
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: November 08, 2012, 11:15:25 PM »

Pardon my ignorance, but how come the Congressional District map in Washington is so favorable to the GOP? Back in time WA CDs used to be clearly divided by the Cascade Range, with Democrats winning the 7 seats west to it while republicans won the two eastern seats. This time around, it looks like there are two seats which cross this border, and both went republican. Since Washington gained a seat in reapportionment, it seems logical that the East gets more than two seats, and thus a district has to cross the border. But why two instead? And why the GOP seems to be easily ahead in both?

I can't see how the republicans could have passed a gerrymandered map, so... how did democrats agree to this?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,288
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2012, 12:35:05 AM »

What's up with Whitman County? Why did it have the largest swing to Romney in the state?

Probably lower turnout among WSU's students.

Pardon my ignorance, but how come the Congressional District map in Washington is so favorable to the GOP? Back in time WA CDs used to be clearly divided by the Cascade Range, with Democrats winning the 7 seats west to it while republicans won the two eastern seats. This time around, it looks like there are two seats which cross this border, and both went republican. Since Washington gained a seat in reapportionment, it seems logical that the East gets more than two seats, and thus a district has to cross the border. But why two instead? And why the GOP seems to be easily ahead in both?

I can't see how the republicans could have passed a gerrymandered map, so... how did democrats agree to this?

Well, bipartisan redistricting tends to give incumbent protection a high priority.

But also, a minority advocacy group lobbied hard for a majority-minority district. The Republicans cleverly realized that if they supported the plan, they could pack a lot of Democrats into it. The Democrats caved. Of course, for our state legislature, when it came to making a truly majority-minority district in Eastern Washington (around 75% non-white, that they could've maybe won by the end of the decade), the Republicans refused and got their way. We talked about it a lot in the redistricting thread. Tongue

That's pretty sad... We Dems can't even draw a decent map when we hold the governorship and the legislature...

And this whole majority-minority thing is killing the Dems throughout the country. We need to realize that's bullsh*t.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,288
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2012, 12:55:07 AM »

Any chance the legislature changes their mind before 2014?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,288
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2019, 01:03:29 AM »

So Sawant has pulled ahead!! Cheesy Thank goodness.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.